Operators#
- HeckeOperator(M, n): ModSS, RngIntElt -> AlgMatElt#
Compute a matrix representing the \(n\)th Hecke operator \(T_n\) with respect to
Basis(M)for the supersingular module \(M\).
- AtkinLehnerOperator(M, q): ModSS, RngIntElt -> AlgMatElt#
A matrix representing the Atkin-Lehner involution \(W_q\) on the supersingular module \(M\). The number \(q\) must equal either
Prime(M)orAuxiliaryLevel(M).
- Example: Operators (ex-d33253)#
In this example we observe that \(T_2\) and \(W_3\) have the same characteristic polynomial on \(S_2(\Gamma_0(33))\) as on the cuspidal subspace of the supersingular module with \(p=11\), \(N=3\).
> SS := CuspidalSubspace(SupersingularModule(11, 3)); > MF := CuspForms(33, 2); > Factorization(CharacteristicPolynomial(HeckeOperator(SS, 2))); [ <$.1 - 1, 1>, <$.1 + 2, 2> ] > Factorization(CharacteristicPolynomial(HeckeOperator(MF, 2))); [ <$.1 - 1, 1>, <$.1 + 2, 2> ] > Factorization(CharacteristicPolynomial(AtkinLehnerOperator(SS, 3))); [ <$.1 - 1, 1>, <$.1 + 1, 2> ] > Factorization(CharacteristicPolynomial(AtkinLehnerOperator(MF, 3))); [ <$.1 - 1, 2>, <$.1 + 1, 1> ]
The supersingular module with \(p=3\) and \(N=11\) is isomorphic as a module to the subspace of \(3\)-new cuspforms in \(S_2(\Gamma_0(33))\).
> SS := CuspidalSubspace(SupersingularModule(3, 11)); > MF := NewSubspace(CuspForms(33,2), 3); > HeckeOperator(SS, 17); [-2] > HeckeOperator(MF, 17); [-2] > AtkinLehnerOperator(SS, 11); [-1] > AtkinLehnerOperator(MF, 11); [-1]